Vampire Literature Flashcard

Vampire Literature

The Bear by William Faulkner free essay sample

Faulkner’s novella â€Å"The Bear† from his assortment of works, Go Down Moses, is a representative investigation of the connection among man and nature according to a little fellow. The core of the issue, the twisted thought of the responsibility for, is uncovered idea the conflict of man and nature in a wild pursue that closes just in blood and demise. The prey is nature itself, spoke to by a bear, while the trackers are men, loaded with ravenousness and dangerous possessiveness, seeking after that which they don't comprehend. Ike’s thought of the bear, introduced in area 1 of the novella, communicates the possibility of imagery comparable to the hold up under and to the trackers and what the fight between the two speaks to. The bear itself, Old Ben, is an image for nature in what he profoundly encapsulates. He is portrayed by Ike as being â€Å"too big,† a beast that â€Å"loomed and towered† (193) over the little fellow, the bear was something to fear. We will compose a custom exposition test on The Bear by William Faulkner or then again any comparative subject explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Men â€Å"tried to ride it down† (193) and shoot shots into it’s cover up, however the bear lived on, never hurt or staged by the â€Å"little tiny people. (194) It kept on plundering the homesteads close to the forested areas, taking yields and disfiguring creatures, acquiring for himself the name of Old Ben and a notoriety â€Å"like a living man. † (192) As soon as Old Ben took on a personality, he turned out to be something beyond a bear, but instead an image for nature overall. Ike alludes to Old Ben as large, which is corresponding to the name he has gave to the forested areas, the â€Å"big woods. † (192) The change from mammoth to otherworldly substance, while holding dread, speak to how man sees nature as frightening and savage, something he should win. The hunters’ inflexible want to decimate Old Ben shows their genuinely damaging nature, as the men will not recognize that they are the ones attacking nature and gradually crushing it for their own advantage. Old Ben is a casualty of ravenousness, yet he shows no dread, he won't cover up, and subsequently communicates nature’s enthusiasm for opportunity and its dauntless will that will not be vanquished, at any rate not without a battle. It is Ike’s appreciation of these qualities in the entry that lead him to the acknowledgment that responsibility for land is malevolent and wrong, the soul of nature can't be so effortlessly subdued. Upon his first experience with the forested areas, Ike is lost in wonder, it has been his fantasy for whatever length of time that he could make sure to join the men on the chase and investigate the excellence of the large woods. What separates Ike from different men, be that as it may, is his miracle of the wild, of its size, however of what puzzles it contains. At the point when he shows up he feels the need â€Å"to procure for himself from the wild the name and condition of tracker gave he in his term were modest and suffering enough. (192) Ike doesn’t want the endorsement of any of the other tracker, his cousin, or even his savvy coach Sam Fathers. Rather he realizes that the option to guarantee the name of tracker lies in winning the endorsement â€Å"from the wilderness† and to do so he should be â€Å"humble and persevering. † (192) Those words don't appear to fit with the brutal demonstrations of different trackers; to them the capacity to shoot and sla ughter is all that truly matters, thus the lack of regard for Boon and the situation of Walter Ewell as a senior tracker. By utilizing delicate words Faulkner expresses that there is a whole other world to â€Å"hunting† than murdering, what Ike wants and tries to substantiate himself deserving of is having a place with nature, to feel its magnificence and quality going through him. Without this feeling of endorsement and having a place from the forested areas, Ike feels he is disgraceful to end the life of a creature and to utilize what he has picked up from death to improve his own life. It is Ike’s one of a kind perspective on nature and the bear that bring about his apparently crazy choice about surrendering the manor. At the point when Old Ben passes on, he is executed by Boon, whose rash and brutal activities represent human ruinous tendency and want to have. Shelter needed to have and tame Lion, yet Lion was a monster and kicked the bucket in the battle with the Bear, whom Boon slaughtered. This demise is the thing that stunned Ike into acknowledging how wrong it is for a human to attempt to have a creature, a monster, or anything that had a place with the wild, including the land itself. Shelter was not deserving of ending the life of Old Ben, he had not earned the privilege from the old woods, and this misfortune is felt vigorously by Ike, he starts to convey the soul of Old Ben and the wild with him, utilizing its influence and solidarity to right the wrongs man has never really land. This is the thinking behind Ike’s refusal to assume control over the ranch, he realizes man can't â€Å"own† land, it is a wild and free thing that has its own soul, and it is the rough breaking of this soul by furrows and tomahawks that prompted the destruction of the South. Men there wouldn’t stop at simply land, their covetousness and want to have stretched out to people and the evil entity of bondage, which prompted gore, agony, and misfortune in the Civil War. Ike realized he needed to right these wrongs so as to procure his entitlement to live in nature, in this world, so he revoked the red-recolored land and returned levy to the wronged other portion of his family in endeavor to recuperate the land and the individuals he wronged. Despite the fact that Ike realizes he can never genuinely fix the harms done, the soul of Old Ben running inside him pushed him to do as well as could be expected. Man’s bent conviction that anything can be possessed, land or individual, is annihilating nature, gradually executing it until it can't battle any longer, similarly as the trackers scrutinized Old Ben. Ike knows this, he realizes man is executing his methods forever and even himself, and to pay his resects to nature he attempts the privilege the wrongs of his family, yet even as Ike goes to bat for nature, he realizes he is taking on a losing conflict. The common world will bite the dust at the merciless and eager hands of mankind.

Philosophy 101 Study Guide

* Socrates: Philosopher who had confidence in an outright set in stone; asked understudies guided inquiries toward make them utilize their explanation, later became Socratic Method. Accused of presenting weird divine beings and ruining the youthful, he ended it all. * Rhetoric: Saying things in a persuading matter * Skepticism: The possibility that nothing can ever be known without a doubt. * Sophists: A savvy and educated individual, disparaging of customary folklore, dismissed â€Å"fruitless† philosophical speculations.A individual from a school of antiquated Greek expert thinkers who were master in and shown the abilities of talk, contention, and discussion, yet were censured for presumptive thinking. * Socratic Irony: Feign Ignorance, or claim to be more moronic than truly are to uncover the shortcomings of individuals' reasoning * â€Å"One thing just I know, and that will be that I know nothing† * â€Å"He comprehends what great is will do good† * Plato (4 28-347 B. C. Athens, Greece): Student of Socrates. Set up ‘The Academy'. Composed Dialogs. He was a Dualist. * Two sections to a human: Body ; Soul Plato viewed the body and soul as discrete elements * An individual may pine for or have a hunger for something, yet oppose the hankering with resolution. An accurately working soul requires the most elevated part, reason, to control the least part, craving, with help from the will. * Plato accepted that however the body kicks the bucket and breaks down, the spirit keeps on living for eternity. After the passing of the body, the spirit relocates to what Plato called the domain of the unadulterated structures. There, it exists without a body, thinking about the forms.After a period, the spirit is resurrected in another body and comes back to the world. Be that as it may, the resurrected soul holds a diminish memory of the domain of structures and longs for it * Theory of thoughts/frames: the truth behind the material world, which co ntains the unceasing and unchanging â€Å"patterns† behind the different wonders, we go over in nature. * Plato accepted that everything substantial in nature streams. There are no substances that don't break down, thus everything is made of an ageless â€Å"mold† or â€Å"form† that is endless and unchanging. * Eternal: Lasting or existing orever; without end or starting. * Immutable: Unable to be changed * Form (Ideas): A structure is a theoretical property or quality. Take any property of an article; separate it from that protest and think about it without anyone else, and you are mulling over a structure. For instance, on the off chance that you separate the roundness of a b-ball from its shading, its weight, and so forth and think about only roundness without anyone else, you are thinking about the from of roundness. * The structures are extraordinary. This implies they don't exist in existence. A material item, a ball, exists at a specific spot at a specif ic time.A structure, roundness, doesn't exist at wherever or time. * Pure †the structures just embody one property. Material items are polluted; they consolidate various properties, for example, darkness, circularity, and hardness into one article. * Archetypes †The structures are originals; that is, they are ideal instances of the property that they epitomize. The structures are the ideal models whereupon every single material item are based. The type of redness, for instance, is red, and every single red item are essentially defective * Ultimately Real †The structures are the eventually genuine elements, not material objects.All material articles are duplicates or pictures of some assortment of structures; their world comes just from the structures. * Causes †The structures are the reasons for all things. * They give the clarification of why anything is how it is * They are the source or birthplace of the being of all things * Systematically Interconnected â₠¬ The structures contain a framework driving down from the type of the Good moving from increasingly broad to progressively specific, from increasingly goal to more subjective.This deliberate structure is reflected in the structure of the rationalization procedure by which we come to information on the structures. * Realm of Forms (World of Ideas): The world that we see through the brain, utilizing our ideas, is by all accounts perpetual and constant. People approach the domain of structures through the psyche, through explanation, given Plato's hypothesis of the regions of the human spirit. This gives them access to a perpetual world, insusceptible to the torments and changes of the material world.By segregating ourselves from the material world and our bodies and building up our capacity to fret about the structures, we discover a worth which isn't available to change or breaking down. * Realm of the Illusory (World of the Senses): The world we see through the faculties is by all accounts continually evolving. It appears that all the articles we see with the faculties are basically pictures or encounters in our psyche. They are just emotional purposes of perspectives on the genuine items. For instance, the world shows up fundamentally distinctively to a visually challenged individual than it does to us.The objects that we see as shaded, at that point, must not be the genuine articles, however simply our experience of these items that is controlled by my specific emotional perspective and perceptual contraption. * True Knowledge * He accepted that as aftereffect of the consistent change inside the material world we would never truly have genuine information. * Eros: Greek divine force of adoration; child of Aphrodite; frequently demonstrated blindfolded * Rationalism: the conviction that human explanation is the essential wellspring of our insight into the world * Three pieces of the Soul Reason (Intellect) * In the Head * Provide Wisdom * Where our individua l/one of a kind abilities lie * If reason works amazingly (arete) at that point we are shrewd to that degree * If we practice knowledge to the degree then that piece of the spirit is magnificent * Responsible for affection for learning, energetic, and enlivened * Passion [Appetite/Desire] * From Greek word â€Å"Pathe† meaning the unreasonable developments of the spirit * In gut * Provides balance If enthusiasm works incredibly then we are mild * If we practice balance to the degree then that piece of the spirit is fantastic * Responsible for Desire * Thymos * Means Spirit/Will * In Heart * Provides Courage * Can assist reason with acing energy * If we practice mental fortitude to the degree then that piece of the spirit is brilliant * Responsible for outrage * Views on Women: Plato accepted that ladies had a right, or you may even consider it a task to carry out in the public arena. Their job was to be a critical piece of society, not quite the same as men, yet at the same t ime play a part.Plato accepted that ladies were important for society to run easily. * Women were not equivalents of men * Women needed quality * Women are normally maternal * In Plato’s time it was unbelievable to see ladies as in excess of a bit of property. * Dualist: a sharp division between the truth of thought and expanded reality. * Aristotle (384-322 B. C; Macedonia, Athens): Pupil of Plato's. Trusted Plato's universe of thoughts didn't exist however that the endless thought was actually an idea the possibility of a pony that we have in the wake of seeing huge numbers of them. Learn know through the faculties. â€Å"20 questions†. Causes * What sort of material it is made of? * Wood * What kind of thing it is? * Table * What made it appear? * How it was constructed; the undertaking should have been done to make the table * Purpose or Final Cause (Telos): The reason, end, point, or objective of something. The last reason is the reason why a thing exists. * Meant to be a supper table or work area * Views on Women: Viewed them as â€Å"unfinished men†. * Golden Mean: One can't be a lot of a certain something or excessively less, should be adjusted * Empiricism: Derive all information from what the faculties tell us.There are no intrinsic thoughts and can't demonstrate the presence of God, endlessness or substance * Hellenism: The timeframe and the Greek-overwhelmed culture that won in the three Hellenistic Kingdoms of Macedonia, Syria, and Egypt. The dissemination of Greek Culture all through the Mediterranean world after the victory of Alexander the Great. * The Cynics: True bliss doesn't originate from outer focal points, similar to control/great wellbeing. When you have genuine satisfaction, it can't be lost. Their own/others wellbeing shouldn't upset them. * The Stoics * Stoicism was established by a man named Zeno, who lived from 335-263 BC. He used to address not in a homeroom however outside, on the patio of an open structure * The word for yard in Greek is STOA, thus individuals called his understudies Stoics * People should attempt to arrive at internal quietness * Moderate in everything * Be content with what they had. This would prompt a glad life * The best sign of a person's way of thinking was not what an individual said but rather how he carried on * Destructive feelings came about because of mistakes in judgment * Sage: individual of â€Å"moral and scholarly perfection† * Would not experience the ill effects of such feelings The Epicureans: They accepted delight is the best acceptable, however to achieve joy was to live unobtrusively, gain information on the operations of the world, and breaking point to one's wants. * Neo-Platonism: Belief of two posts on Earth, one end is the plunge light called the One (God). Opposite end is outright haziness, no presence, the nonappearance of light. * Syncretism: The joining of various convictions, regularly while merging acts of different ways of thi nking. * Mysticism: One with God, converging with him. â€Å"I am God. † or â€Å"I am You. † * Two Cultures The Indo-Europeans: Related dialects of Europe, India, and Iran, which are accepted to have slid from a typical tongue spoken generally in the third thousand years B. C. by an agrarian people groups beginning in SE Europe * The Semites: An individual from any of the people groups who talk or communicated in a Semitic language, remembering for specific the Jews and Arabs-for the most part Middle Easterners, they considered history to be an on going line, world will end on day of atonement * The Middle Ages: Period of European history from the fifth century to the fifteenth century * St. Augustine: Latin-speakin

Free will Vs. Determinism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Choice Vs. Determinism - Essay Example the ability to decide, make strides and set up a particular implicit rules in regards to their exercises identified with the individual and expert commitments with no common and social obstacles or obstacles. Thusly, causality of progress and development is dependent of people’s individual desire and goals. Despite what might be expected, determinism energetically centers upon the very rule that man is reliant of some outer powers in the entirety of his exercises, and these outside powers, identified with over a wide span of time, decide his future activities, conducts and the destiny also. Since both these terms have direct association with individual and aggregate existence of the individuals, their examination is unquestionably of fundamental significance for fathoming with and investigation of characteristic and social marvel existing known to mankind on the loose. Faith in extraordinary powers just as supernatural articles is additionally unforeseen to the scholarly exami nation of the extension and extent of through and through freedom and determinism. The inquiry emerges why the issue of through and through freedom versus determinism is the issue. Since savants and scholars have all the earmarks of being at strife on the issue, and have introduced their ideas for just as against unrestrained choice and determinism, it has welcomed the interest of the masterminds for the further examination of the theme. Moreover, however the scholars including Halboch, Campbell, James and others have endeavored to dismiss Schlick’s hypothesis of choice, yet none of them could express the other structure in opposition to that of Moritz Schlick; nor the scholars could figured out how to offer answer for invalidate the through and through freedom in a complete manner. It is consequently the discussion despite everything fills in as a debatable issue even this day. Another explanation behind being this issue an issue incorporates the basic noteworthiness of the subject, which keeps up direct relationship with the controls identified with ration ale, theory, human brain research and political theory. A few speculations have been

Precedent vs. Precedence

Point of reference versus Priority Point of reference versus Priority Point of reference versus Priority By Maeve Maddox An entry in a paper article provoked this email from a peruser: Im scowling at a Virginia paper passage:the first paid occasion held at the lodge territory, which may set priority for future occasions I accept the creator isn't stating this may make the future occasions start things out. It would be ideal if you talk about the distinction among points of reference and priority. The comparability of elocution is maybe one reason for disarray between points of reference [PRES-ih-dents] and priority [PRES-ih-dence], yet the mistake additionally happens with priority and particular point of reference. The words are firmly related in inception and importance. Among the implications of Latin praecädäns are â€Å"a individual who goes in front,† â€Å"a individual who positions above,† and â€Å"a earlier event.† The thing priority may have started as an incorrect spelling of the plural of point of reference, yet it has gained its very own unmistakable significance. Priority implies, â€Å"the actuality of being above or in front of another or others all together, position, or importance.† A typical maxim is â€Å"to take precedence,† meaning â€Å"to appreciate the privilege of going before others in functions and social formalities.† A site on strategic convention for the nation of Saint Lucia gives a case of this use: The Prime Minister, similar to the Governor-General, as the Head of Government, is qualified for specific benefits and courtesies.â He/she has the privilege of priority in all conditions, with the exception of when the Governor-General is in participation. Things just as individuals may â€Å"take precedence† in the feeling of being regarded above something different. A case of this utilization happens in a discourse by a head administrator of Singapore: For a strict individual, still, small voice and strict conviction overshadow the laws of the state, however in a multi-strict society like our own, it gets pivotal to keep religion carefully separate from governmental issues. A point of reference is â€Å"a past occasion taken for instance or rule by which to be guided in comparable cases or circumstances.† A typical colloquialism is â€Å"to set a precedent.† In a legitimate setting, a point of reference is a legal choice that comprises a definitive model for resulting comparable cases. For instance: â€Å"Griswold v. Connecticutâ served as a significant point of reference in the Roe v. Wadeâ decision.† Here, with revisions, are some ordinary blunders in the utilization of priority for point of reference: Off base: A court administering expected soon-originating from community to pretrial data in the William Cruse murder case-may set a priority in what can be accounted for in criminal cases before preliminaries. Right : A court administering expected soon-coming from free to pretrial data in the William Cruse murder case-may start a trend in what can be accounted for in criminal cases before preliminaries. Inaccurate: If the studio accomplishes anyplace close to a similar measure of achievement theyve seen with Cinderella, which has earned about $160 million since its March 13 discharge, it might set a priority for all the more cutting edge flicks to come. Right : If the studio accomplishes anyplace close to a similar measure of progress theyve seen with Cinderella, which has earned about $160 million since its March 13 discharge, it might start a trend for all the more real to life flicks to come. Wrong: The Kyoto Protocol has setâ a noteworthy precedenceâ for atmosphere target arrangements later on, and especially concerning separation of targets betweenâ countries. Right : The Kyoto Protocol has setâ a noteworthy point of reference for atmosphere target arrangements later on, and especially regarding separation of targets betweenâ countries. Need to improve your English shortly a day? Get a membership and begin accepting our composing tips and activities day by day! Continue learning! Peruse the Misused Words class, check our well known posts, or pick a related post below:Comparative Forms of Adjectives5 Brainstorming Strategies for WritersBail Out versus Bundle Out

This Past Week at SIPA Will China Run out of Water COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

This Past Week at SIPA Will China Run out of Water COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog The Earth Institutes Columbia Water Center Seminar Series this past week presented Will China Run Out Of Water? with Chunmiao Zheng, Professor of Hydrogeology; SSPA Faculty Fellow; 2009 Birdsall-Dreiss Distinguished Lecturer, University of Alabama. The following comes from the Earth Institutes Web site: The American agricultural expert and environmentalist Lester Brown published a provocative book in 1995 called “Who Will Feed China: Wake-Up Call for a Small Planet.” Today, however, of a greater concern may be the question of whether the unprecedented economic growth in China over the past two decades can be sustained as the environmental pollution and water shortage continue to worsen. Some people have asked, “Will China run out of water?” This question is not merely academic: China has to nourish a fifth of the global population with about seven percent of the planet’s water resources. Ample evidence suggests that China faces a daunting water resource crisis. The country has been battling water shortages in its northern and western provinces for more than a decade. The presentation draws on the presenter’s recent research work in the North China Plain and the Ordos Basin in western China. Chunmiao Zheng received the B.S. degree in geology from Chengdu University of Technology (China) in 1983, and the Ph.D. degree in hydrogeology with a minor in civil environmental engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1988. From 1988 to 1993, he was a hydrogeologist at the environmental consulting firm S.S. Papadopulos Associates, Inc. Since 1993, he has been a professor of hydrogeology in the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Alabama. For a profile of Chunmiao Zheng click here.

Schizophrenia Symptoms and Treatment in A Beautiful Mind - Free Essay Example

The film A Beautiful Mind chronicles the adult life of John Nash Jr., a Nobel Prize recipient widely regarded as a brilliant mathematician who greatly influenced modern economic theory. The film focuses on Nashs decades long struggle with paranoid schizophrenia after he receives a diagnosis in 1958. Although it is well known that Nash was diagnosed with schizophrenia in real life, I will use this paper to discuss specific symptoms portrayed in the film, and consider how his treatment and environment contributed to his relative recovery later in life. In the film, we follow Nashs long decent and subsequent recovery from schizophrenia as it spans his early 30s until his winning the Nobel Prize in 1994 in his 70s. We meet his character on the campus of Princeton, where he is pursuing his doctorate degree in Mathematics. We can see that Nash is a little different than his colleagues, and while charming, he has difficulty conforming to the social norms expected from his fellow students and professors. In dogged pursuit of an original idea, Nash is portrayed as a stubborn and driven outsider, an eccentric with questionable interpersonal skills. He is often disheveled, wandering the university halls talking to himself, or feverishly scrawling math equations on library windows. During his early years on campus, we see he has difficulty eating regular meals or maintaining consistent personal hygiene. His only close friend is his roommate Charles, who helps keep him grounded and focused. Despite some of these challenges, Nashs dissertation on Game Theory is considered genius and groundbreaking. He graduates from Princeton and is offered a prestigious job at the Rand Corporation. He also teaches at MIT and here he meets and marries graduate student Alicia Larde Lopez-Harrison. Nash excels at his job, and he is soon contacted by a United States Department of Defense agent, William Parcher. Agent Parcher believes Nashs exceptional abilities as a code-breaker can help detect Russian attempts to infiltrate American democracy. Nash becomes fixated and determined in his high stakes mission, but it is isolating due to the classified and top secret nature of the work. Danger and intrigue explode in this part of the firm, and Nash increasingly becomes convinced he will be killed by Russian operatives. As viewers, we believe his paranoia is well founded, fearful for him and his family as it seems the Russians are closing in. In a chaotic chase scene Nashs panic climaxes and he screams at his wife to call the police. In a plot twist, Alicia calls a psychiatric hospital, and Nash is brought into care involuntarily. We soon understand that Nashs DOD code-breaking operations are not real, but a part of his mental illness. Nash, at age 30, appears to experience adult onset paranoid schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a serious and chronic mental disorder characterized by a breakdown in thought, feeling, and behavior. Often someone who suffers from schizophrenia experiences a psychotic episode where what is real and what is imagined is hard to distinguish. Symptoms fall into two classifications, both negative and positive. Negative symptoms include a lack of normal cognitive, emotional, or social responses, a flat affect, or a disinterest in interpersonal relationships. Positive symptoms include delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking and behavior. In order to be diagnosed with schizophrenia, a person must experience at least one of these symptoms for 6 months or longer. Psychologists must rule out mood disturbance, brain trauma, and drug use (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). In the following paragraphs we will discuss the symptoms Nash exhibits in the film, and if the symptomatic presentations are realistic. Nash experiences a psychotic break from reality during his tenure at MIT and the Rand Corporation, however there were early signs of his illness during his time at Princeton. Nashs character is clearly functional he has an exceptionally high IQ and is pursuing a difficult math degree at a prestigious institution. However, Nash experiences difficulty working with others and following social norms. When he feels like his intellect is not understood by one of his advisors he throws a desk out of his dorm window. Meeting and dating women do not come easy to Nash either. His flat affect and inappropriately direct tone with several women earn him a few slaps across the face. He has difficulty making eye contact and has detectable psychomotor retardation. At this point in the film Nash comes across as an eccentric but lovable genius, but his early symptoms are consistent with, and foretelling of, his later diagnosis. As Nash graduates from Princeton, he publishes his groundbreaking paper on Game Theory and lands a prestigious position at Rand Corporation and MIT. He meets and marries his wife Alicia, and for several years he continues to be functioning as an employee and a husband. As time passes, the film portrays Nash as more disheveled, unshaven, disorganized, and consumed with his top secret DOD code-breaking work. We see papers crumpled and overflowing out of his briefcase, he is constantly cutting out newspaper clippings, and he commonly misses appointments or dates because time gets away from him. However, like his colleagues and wife, we as the viewer believe he is deteriorating because of the classified work is stressful. By 1958 Alicia and Nash have a son, when soon after he is admitted into a psychiatric hospital. Here we learn the extent of Nashs break from reality, and his more attenuating symptoms are discovered. We learn his roommate Charles and Agent Parcher are not real, rather they are part of his long lasting and pervasive delusions and hallucinations. (The film takes some dramatic liberties by utilizing visual hallucinations as opposed to the more common auditory hallucinations. Nash spoke publicly later in life stating his hallucinations were auditory). We find there is no record of Nash having Charles as a roommate, and it becomes evident he has suffered from hallucinations for at least 10 years. The additional hallucination of Agent Parcher is an indicator that he is getting worse over time, and it is clear that Nash meets the criteria of having symptoms for 6 months or longer. The paranoid delusions are also a cornerstone to Nashs diagnosis. He believes he is a highly valuable asset to the American government in the fight against Communist Russia. The belief that he is being followed and that they are trying to kill him is a common delusion among those who suffer from paranoid schizophrenia, and the film is highly realistic in this manner. It is also worth noting that Nash has a difficult time believing he is illit takes him months to understand his reality is imagined, also a common symptom of schizophrenia. In the film, Nash is treated with deep insulin shock therapy (DIST) in the psychiatric hospital when he is first admitted. Developed in the 1930s, DIST emerged as one of the major treatments for schizophrenia until it was discredited in the late 1950s (Jones, 2000). We see Nash strapped onto a table, as various medical professionals administer insulin. His body experiences violent seizures and falls into a coma, a procedure believed to cure him of imbalances that were thought to cause schizophrenia. This procedure is hard to watch, and deeply upsetting to Nash and his wife. When he is sent home we also see he is prescribed a pill he is supposed to take daily. The film does not go into detail, but based on the year and the dosage we can guess the pill is most likely a first-generation antipsychotic. The film highlights another important and realistic component of mental health treatment; medication adverse effects. Both DIST and early generation antipsychotics were unpleasant and their side effects great. We see Nash experience flat affect, mood disturbance, and sexual dysfunction. He complains he is unable to think clearly and develop new areas for research, which cause him to secretly discontinue taking his medication. After some time off the antipsychotic and a refusal to receive another round of DIST, his delusions and hallucinations return. This part of the film is highly congruent with reality and proves to be an opportunity for viewers to understand the struggle with medication adherence in this patient population. Nash, with the support of his wife, ultimately decide to discontinue treatment in order to avoid many of the adverse side effects. He believes he can cognitively overcome his mental illness by understanding his hallucinations and delusions are not real. Although Nash does not return to complete health, he is able to manage his schizophrenia, return to work, and contribute to society. This case may be an outlier as far as positive long-term outcomes. Many people with schizophrenia need medication to lead a meaningful life, and there is some possibility that the film may promote false hope in suggesting treatment is not necessary. However, there are longitudinal studies indicating not all patients need antipsychotics continuously throughout there lives to significantly recover (Harrow, Jobe, Faull, 2012). The consequences of the illness on Nashs career and family are highly realistic and help shed light on the far reaching struggles associated with schizophrenia. The film does an excellent job in highlighting the burden a psychiatric illness can put not only on the patient, but on their loved ones as well. Nashs illness, untreated prior to diagnosis, is extremely disruptive and scary. He slowly becomes unable to preform in his job, and his behavior at home is unpredictable. Although some clarity and stability come with the diagnosis, Nash and his family reel from the side effects of treatment. He exhibits an almost catatonic affect, is unable to think clearly, and is unable to preform his duties as a husband and father. Nash experiences relapses because he stops taking his medication, a common and difficult aspect of this particular mental illness, and the family is thrown into disarray again. Until Nash gets his symptoms under control without treatment, something he ultimately was ab le to do, Alicia struggles with the burdens of taking care of their child, running the house, earning an income, and watching over Nash. The film does a good job of portraying how isolating a severe mental illness diagnosis is for the patient and the support system, and how difficult and long the recovery can be. It is also worth noting that the support of Alicia and Nashs colleagues most likely had a profound effect on his prognosis. More favorable risk and protective factors and better neurocognitive skills are associated with longer periods of recovery (Harrow, et al, 2012). A Beautiful Mind is a well-crafted film portraying the intricacies and realities of living with paranoid schizophrenia to broad audience. Although John Nashs case is unusual in some respectshis above average intellect and strong support systemthe film realistically presents classic positive and negative symptoms. The film also presents general treatment and therapy in an accurate historical context, and explores Nashs specific individual choice to not receive treatment. In doing so, the film was able to portray many of the complexities associated with mental illness, and address certain stigmas and misconceptions associated with paranoid schizophrenia.